Where did ALS go wrong?
Apart from the fact that it pissed off too many stakeholders
from different areas I think they got too gready too. I understand that we live
in world with a messed up economy and one needs to make savings in order to
stay on top of things, however one needs to note “how much savings” and how
these are applied.
Who have they managed to piss off so far? Well…let’s see:
interpreters, translation agencies, MP’s (to be fair some of them as majority
do not care much about it), chartered bodies, alliances, unions, solicitors,
and the list goes on.
The Government/MOJ awarded this contract to ALS in the name
of savings creating a monopoly on the market and allowing to one almighty
agency to rule the market. This is wrong at so many levels.
Firstly we, the UK people, are supposed to be living in a
democratic society and operating a free market. Having one agency rule the
market is not the way forward. Maybe in China and other dictatorship countries…but
UK is supposed to be “special”.
The MOJ did not think for a second that it might actually be
beneficial to attach some strings to this contract such as: use local people
for local jobs, give a certain percentage of jobs to other stakeholders and
agencies, etc? Oh..no..God forbid!
And what does almighty ALS do? They publish piss taking
rates which – note!! – are not for negotiation. These non-negotiable rates are
for freelancers such as spanish
translators who work as self employed. Hmm…I wonder what does HMRC think
about that when one of the tests of establishing if one is self-employed is “who
dictates how where and when and how much”. So then if the answer is ALS, then
surely these people all of the sudden become PAYE. Or has common and statutory
law changed since this contract was awarded? Have we all of the sudden live on
Greek or Spanish grounds?
So their attitude is “take
it or leave it” or “take it or leave profession”! What does the Governement do?
Well…to put is bluntly N O T H I N G. They don’t care people go out of business
– the very business that is suppose to support the fragile economy – and that
these very people are thrown back at the system. How are they thrown back? Well
“simples”: if one can’t afford to live they claim benefits. Superb!
I ALS would have partnered with a few other agencies and
split the pie, they would have had a lot more success.http://www.appliedlanguage.com/
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home